From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:57:35 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Supporting a second Barebox build to build the MLO/SPL In-Reply-To: <1445801636-7554-1-git-send-email-pieter@boesman.nl> References: <1445801636-7554-1-git-send-email-pieter@boesman.nl> Message-ID: <20151026045735.52c0f9e5@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Pieter Smith, On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:33:52 +0100, Pieter Smith wrote: > Pieter Smith (4): > barebox: prepare for x-loader build > barebox: adds option to build x-loader > barebox: user selection of build output images > beaglebone: adds barebox bootloader defconfig > > boot/barebox/Config.in | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > boot/barebox/barebox-boot/barebox-boot.hash | 1 + > boot/barebox/barebox-boot/barebox-boot.mk | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > boot/barebox/barebox-xload/barebox-xload.hash | 1 + > boot/barebox/barebox-xload/barebox-xload.mk | 51 +++++++++++++++ > boot/barebox/barebox.mk | 60 +---------------- > configs/beaglebone_barebox_defconfig | 38 +++++++++++ I believe "xload" is really a term tied to the OMAP platforms, but Barebox can have this dual configuration situation for other platforms as well (ex: Atmel). Some other platforms use the term "SPL". Can we find some better name ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com