From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] core: fix setting of HOSTARCH
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:53:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111235359.707acc35@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447095621-32080-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Yann, Peter,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:00:21 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Currently, we set HOSTARCH to the output of `uname -m`. This gives us
> But since w eintroduced the latest Linaro toolchains, we now have
> toolchains that require a 64-bit userland.
>
> So, when running on a 64-bit kernel, we believe those toolchains are
> available, even when the user is running a 32-bit userland. This causes
> build failures for our autobuilders, like so:
>
> http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/9cd/9cdf10ec5b31144b2e03ea09cf128702339895b3/
Those build failures are not caused by a 32 bits vs. 64 bits issue. In
fact, I started running my chroot under "linux32", but it was even
worse. Because indeed my chroots *are* 64 bits.
However, the real problem is that the new Linaro toolchains have been
built against glibc 2.14 (for the host), while my chroot only uses
glibc 2.11 (from Debian 6.0).
I'm not sure how to handle this. Some old distros may not have glibc
2.14.
Suggestions?
In any case, I believe the rework of how we get HOSTARCH is not really
needed IMO: 1/ it is not the source of the problem for the Linaro
toolchain and 2/ it is most likely appropriate to use setarch/linux32
when running a 32 bits chroot under a 64 bits kernel.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 19:00 [Buildroot] [PATCH] core: fix setting of HOSTARCH Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-09 22:01 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-11-09 22:17 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-10 21:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-11-11 22:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-11-11 22:58 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-12 7:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-11-12 17:35 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-12 8:11 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-11-12 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-12 8:49 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-01-19 23:11 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151111235359.707acc35@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox