From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:14:41 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/gcc: align gcc-final configure-cmds to the generic ones In-Reply-To: <4d9f7a6896c496372a4f415987e60eeeac79225b.1448202976.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <4d9f7a6896c496372a4f415987e60eeeac79225b.1448202976.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20151123211441.5135a9d2@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Yann, On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 15:39:43 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Since 7d6c79 (Compile static versions of gcc libraries) was applied, the > generic configure commands have been updated, but those changes have not > been propagated to the gcc-final custom configure commands. > > Update the gcc-final custom configure commands to better match the > generic ones. > > We do not propagate --disable-dependency-tracking because it breaks the > build, and --enable-shared (because of 169141a). > > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni A little bit like Arnout, I am not sure to see the value of fully aligning the configure commands just for the sake of it. Another possibility is to add a mechanism in the infra to exclude some generic config options from being used. But I tend to hate package infrastructure that are needed only for one package, especially when there is a way of not changing the infrastructure (which is the case here). Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com