From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:57:33 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] Relocatable host tools In-Reply-To: References: <20151211162850.327b9e71@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20151211165733.158cd59b@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:55:09 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > Ah, clearly not! Thanks for the reference. > (I did search in my gmail, but had deleted old mails a while back) > > Are there blocking issues with these patches? There are still some > open comments on v5 but no objections in that iteration. > (I haven't reviewed the code myself yet). > > Samuel, could you also share your view on the status of these patches? > Are you planning a new iteration with Baruch's comments fixed? My objection is that the host rpath checks is done in shell scripts, and the target rpath mungling in python scripts. I'd like to use either one or the other language, but not both. I believe Samuel said he wanted to respin his series, to use python scripts to also do the host rpath checks that were added by Yann. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com