From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:42:23 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] xutil_util-macros: move outside x11r7 scope In-Reply-To: <1449096338-8006-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1449096338-8006-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20151216234223.6abe26c3@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Gustavo, On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:45:38 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > Move to package/util-macros and rename all symbols. > They don't really require x11r7 infrastructure and are in fact needed by > libepoxy which can be made x11r7-less. > > Also add missing select in xfont_encoding for util-macros. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias Since you're renaming the Config.in option, some Config.in.legacy handling is needed. > diff --git a/package/util-macros/Config.in b/package/util-macros/Config.in > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..de0b5bb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/util-macros/Config.in > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_MACROS > + bool "util-macros" > + help > + X.Org autotools utility macros I am wondering if util-macros isn't too generic. Should we name it xorg-util-macros ? xorg-autotools-macros ? But admittedly, that's not matching the upstream name. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com