From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 10/12] package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server: bump version to 1.18.0
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:17:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151219141714.5da170a3@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450522892-14611-10-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>
Dear Bernd Kuhls,
Adding Arnout in Cc, since he is our legacy handling expert :)
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:01:30 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> - added legacy handling for BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_V_1_17
Is this really needed? In any case, without legacy handling, the thing
will automatically fall back to version 1.18, which is what we want. So
I'm questioning whether legacy handling is needed.
> - legacy handling for BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19
> is not needed because this option is not used by other packages
BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19 is a blind option, so
there is no point in adding legacy handling for it.
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_V_1_17
> + bool "xserver_xorg-server package was bumped to 1.18"
> + select BR2_LEGACY
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_V_1_18
Doing a "select" on an item of a choice doesn't work. See the commit
from Arnout about this:
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/commit/?id=94d403d709eb5d0c487630b2eb651932bb488470.
> diff --git a/package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server/Config.in b/package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server/Config.in
> index 84f0298..3e31dc7 100644
> --- a/package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server/Config.in
> +++ b/package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server/Config.in
> @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19
> config BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI
> int
> default 14 if BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_14
> - default 19 if BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19
> + default 20 if BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_20
I don't see where you are adding the definition of the option
BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_20.
I'll mark this patch (and the nouveau patch) as Changes Requested in
patchwork. I don't really have any comments on the nouveau patch, but
since I assumed it depended on this one, I didn't apply it. Can you
resend both once the xserver bump issues are resolved ?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-19 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-19 11:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 01/12] package/apache: bump version to 2.4.18 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 02/12] package/{mesa3d, mesa3d-headers}: bump version to 11.1.0 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/12] package/mesa3d: add support for new virgl Gallium driver Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 21:48 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-12-20 17:01 ` Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 04/12] package/mesa3d: add support for Nouveau DRI driver Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 05/12] package/libva: bump version to 1.6.2 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 06/12] package/libva-intel-driver: " Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 07/12] package/nvidia-driver: bump version to 358.16 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 08/12] package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-ati: bump version to 7.6.1 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 13:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 09/12] package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-intel: bump version Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 10/12] package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server: bump version to 1.18.0 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 13:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-12-19 14:12 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-12-19 14:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 11/12] package/libinput: bump version to 1.1.2 Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 11:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 12/12] package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-nouveau: new package Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 13:13 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 01/12] package/apache: bump version to 2.4.18 Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151219141714.5da170a3@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox