From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:53:23 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] vboot-utils: remove hash file In-Reply-To: <56845669.3050005@mind.be> References: <05e1570e0377fc9e913819765ecb8e488b6b6c1a.1451483256.git.alex.suykov@gmail.com> <20151230160016.14524b1f@free-electrons.com> <56844F79.3080903@mind.be> <20151230225333.171a6c4c@free-electrons.com> <56845669.3050005@mind.be> Message-ID: <20151230235323.3f11d1ea@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:10:49 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > IIRC the main reason why we didn't fully go for the "add hash files for all > packages" approach was that we would need to add an empty hash file for about > 300 packages. But then we discovered that github could have hash files, but we > weren't entirely sure yet if that was really true. > > So I think now we can safely conclude that a hash file should be added for all > packages, even if it just contains 'none' hashes. It is definitely an advantage > to be able to distinguish packages that should still get a hash from packages of Agreed. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com