From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 22:52:28 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] vboot-utils: remove hash file In-Reply-To: <20160101145244.GA29643@vostro> References: <05e1570e0377fc9e913819765ecb8e488b6b6c1a.1451483256.git.alex.suykov@gmail.com> <20151230160016.14524b1f@free-electrons.com> <56844F79.3080903@mind.be> <20151230225333.171a6c4c@free-electrons.com> <56845669.3050005@mind.be> <20151230235323.3f11d1ea@free-electrons.com> <20160101145244.GA29643@vostro> Message-ID: <20160101215228.GC2182@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Alex, All, On 2016-01-01 16:52 +0200, Alex Suykov spake thusly: > Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:53:23PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > > So I think now we can safely conclude that a hash file should be added for all > > > packages, even if it just contains 'none' hashes. It is definitely an advantage > > > to be able to distinguish packages that should still get a hash from packages of > > > > Agreed. > > Ok, got it. > > Does it make sense to update the file name in .hash, or is it ok to leave it as is > since it's not used anyway? It's (version).tar.gz now but the git checkout gets saved > as vboot-utils-(version).tar.gz. Yes, you should update the file name, so that it matches the name the archive is saved as. Thanks for spotting the problem! :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'