From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 23:31:27 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] python-can: bump to 1.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20160101222835.GD2182@free.fr> References: <1451686709-25501-1-git-send-email-yegorslists@googlemail.com> <20160101222835.GD2182@free.fr> Message-ID: <20160102233127.0c6f078c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Yann, all, On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 23:28:35 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > I think we want to use upstream locations as much as possible, and only > fallback to alternative locations when there is no upstream, or upstream > is flaky. For Python packages, I actually find it quite practical when PyPi is used. Indeed, instead of having dozens of weird upstream locations and release behavior, you have one consistent way of fetching Python modules. It also makes it easier when reviewing new packages, when looking at package bumps, since you know what to expect from PyPi. So I wouldn't be as strict as you said in terms of not using PyPi. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com