From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 22:16:50 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/irda-utils: fix musl build In-Reply-To: <1454148798-28228-2-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> References: <1454148798-28228-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <1454148798-28228-2-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> Message-ID: <20160207221650.2ee89791@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Bernd Kuhls, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:13:18 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > diff --git a/package/irda-utils/0004-musl.patch b/package/irda-utils/0004-musl.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e3e766f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/irda-utils/0004-musl.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ > +Fix musl build > + > +Downloaded from > +http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/plain/meta/recipes-connectivity/irda-utils/irda-utils-0.9.18/musl.patch > + > +Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls This... > + > + > +Replace use of with . > + > +kernel headers already provides the > +needed definitions, moreover not all libc implementations > +provide if_packet.h e.g. musl > + > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > +Upstream-Status: Pending ... should have been here. Applied after fixing this. Can you check if the patch has really been submitted upstream? I quickly looked in the irda-utils archives, and couldn't find it. Also, if you could submit upstream the other patches we have, it would be great. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com