From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:24:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2016-03-03 In-Reply-To: References: <20160304073022.647E6102375@stock.ovh.net> Message-ID: <20160304212419.6529ec0c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Gary, On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:13:29 +0100, Gary Bisson wrote: > > Classification of failures by reason > > ==================================== > > > > host-libcap-2.24 | 22 > > python-cryptography-1.2.2 | 22 > > libimxvpuapi-0.10.1 | 5 > > I've looked at the libimxvpuapi failures and they are actually imx-vpu failures. > > The latest imx-vpu only builds if the PLATFORM is MX27, MX53 or MX6Q > but our default is MX25. So the imx-vpu package just does nothing and > then libimxvpuapi fails during configuration because libvpu is > missing. Thanks for investigating! > I'm looking into a solution but those FREESCALE_IMX_PLATFORM_* are not > easy to play with. What do you find not easy with those options? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com