From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:50:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] zsh: don't use host pcre-config In-Reply-To: <20160306143029.0f037047@free-electrons.com> References: <0f3d133b0082f11b75b9fad170d1b81211352dd6.1457041570.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20160306132313.17024d72@free-electrons.com> <20160306131518.GF2877@tarshish> <20160306143029.0f037047@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160306175005.GJ2877@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 02:30:29PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:15:19 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > > So to me, this means that the expected "output" of this macro is to set > > > , which in your case is PRECONF. > > > > Thanks for the information. > > Note that the above was my own interpretation of the autoconf rules, > and what I generally see in most configure.ac. People knowing autoconf > better might disagree. > > > This patch is now upstream, so I'll send another one upstream changing > > $ac_cv_prog_PCRECONF to $PCRECONF. If upstream accepts that I'll send v2 with > > a combined patch. > > Notice that there is another place in the configure.ac where > ac_cv_prog_PRECONF is already used. Right. Provided that other ac_cv_ variables are used throughout zsh configure.ac do you think is is worth the trouble to clean up ac_cv_prog_PCRECONF use? baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -