From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 12/16] elf2flt: use new upstream site and add ARM patch In-Reply-To: <20160317091807.4924cfcc@free-electrons.com> References: <1458164602-16983-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1458164602-16983-13-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <56E9F163.5080304@mind.be> <20160317091807.4924cfcc@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160317185342.GA6588@vapier.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 17 Mar 2016 09:18, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:50:59 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > On 03/16/16 22:43, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > The uClinux developers now have a Github with elf2flt code, with an > > > upstream that is again active. Let's switch to this upstream, to which > > > Waldemar is contributing as well. > > > > While at it, you could have added a hash file. > > Will do. > > > > We also add an ARM patch from Waldemar, which was on his elf2flt > > > repository and he submitted upstream. > > > > That probably should have been a separate patch. > > No: the Waldemar Git repository did contain the ARM noMMU support. So > when switching to the more "official" upstream (which doesn't yet have > ARM noMMU support), we need to include the patch adding ARM noMMU > support to keep functionality the same. elf2flt has had nommu arm support pretty much from the beginning (at least since 2002). i don't know what this patch is for, but it hasn't been sent upstream afaik, so i can't really comment on it. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: