From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:45:51 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 06/16] uclibc: NPTL thread implementation
 only available on MMU platforms
In-Reply-To: <20160317141126.46b73ff2@free-electrons.com>
References: <1458164602-16983-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1458164602-16983-7-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <87vb4l5mjg.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
 <20160317141126.46b73ff2@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <20160317194551.GV21774@waldemar-brodkorb.de>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hi,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,

> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:14:27 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> 
> > Not related to this commit, but I think we should really remove m68k by
> > now - I marked it broken back in 2009 and nobody has cared to fix it:
> > 
> > commit 8161c45b891aca4c3184c320de81a44767c7cece
> > Author: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
> > Date:   Mon Jan 12 20:58:54 2009 +0000
> > 
> >     buildroot: mark ia64, m68k, nios2, sparc and sparc64 as broken
> >     
> >     No sense in showing the architecture options when they cannot even build
> >     the toolchain.
> 
> Let's Cc: Waldemar on this, I believe he has done some work on m68k for
> uClibc-ng.

I have once sent a patch to enable m68k support. It needs to be
updated and incorporate Arnouts review comments.
Is there still interest in reviving m68k support, than I can work on
it.

best regards
 Waldemar