From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:34:54 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 11/16 v5] core/legal-info: renumber saved patches In-Reply-To: <20160319160546.647dd3e4@free-electrons.com> References: <239b97de0688ee582fee97a67f9534cd8ad29493.1457718289.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20160319160546.647dd3e4@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160319233454.GJ3426@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2016-03-19 16:05 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:49:24 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: [--SNIP--] > > Note: an alternative solution was suggested by Luca (and Arnout?), which > > would be to check that no two patches have the same basename or bail-out > > otherwise. I choose to keep the renumbering, because it follows the path > > of least resistance (i.e. it does not break existing setups). > > I second the position of Luca and Arnout. This renumbering is > complicated and leads to ugly patch names that no longer match the > original file name. So please simply bail-out if two patches have the > same name. It's highly unlikely, so I don't think we should renumber > all the patches and have different file names just to avoid this > unlikely case. Done. Thanks! :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'