From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/multicat: fix build with external Blackfin uClibc toolchain
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:22:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160320152212.54caaaa6@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458430906-8291-3-git-send-email-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Hello,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:41:46 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> multicat uses clock_nanosleep() conditionally if HAVE_NANOSLEEP is defined. The
> bad is that multicat does not check for clock_nanosleep(), but defines
"bad .." ?
> HAVE_NANOSLEEP if __APPLE__ is not defined.
>
> uClibc has clock_nanosleep() only if built with UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME.
> and the external Blackfin toolchain has no support for clock_nanosleep().
Are you sure? Here the Blackfin toolchain does have
UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME:
$ grep ADVANCED_REALTIME output/staging/usr/include/bits/uClibc_config.h
#define __UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME__ 1
But indeed it doesn't have clock_nanosleep().
When I saw your patch, I was hoping to be able to replace it with a
patch that tests __UCLIBC__ and __UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME__ to
determine whether we have clock_nanosleep() or not. But it seems like
some other things on Blackfin has the consequence that we don't have
clock_nanosleep(). I looked at uClibc 0.9.33.2 (which is used in the
Blackfin toolchain, as far as I can see), and I couldn't see why
clock_nanosleep() was not provided.
> +# multicat does not test for HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP, but sets it if __APPLE__ is
> +# not defined. The external Blackfin toolchain is uClibc which has
> +# clock_nanosleep() only if built with UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME.
> +# Use a hool to overwrite the definition of HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP for this
hool -> hook
> +# toolchain.
> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BLACKFIN_UCLINUX),y)
> +define MULTICAT_FIXUP_HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP
> +$(SED) 's#define HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP#undef HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP#g' $(@D)/util.h
> +endef
> +MULTICAT_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += MULTICAT_FIXUP_HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP
> +endif
I'll be OK to fix this with a hook, but I'd like to understand why we
don't have clock_nanosleep() on Blackfin. It might affect a significant
number of other packages I believe.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-20 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-19 23:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/multicat: add patch to fix static build Jörg Krause
2016-03-19 23:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/multicat: add patch to fix musl build Jörg Krause
2016-03-20 14:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-19 23:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/multicat: fix build with external Blackfin uClibc toolchain Jörg Krause
2016-03-20 14:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-03-20 17:09 ` Jörg Krause
2016-03-20 17:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-20 14:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/multicat: add patch to fix static build Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160320152212.54caaaa6@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox