From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:01:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] configs: atmel: unify and update defconfig for Xplained boards In-Reply-To: <20160324085406.GE12245@odux.rfo.atmel.com> References: <1458808152-15778-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160324094006.172567ac@free-electrons.com> <20160324084344.GD12245@odux.rfo.atmel.com> <20160324094655.007db654@free-electrons.com> <20160324085406.GE12245@odux.rfo.atmel.com> Message-ID: <20160324090124.GH2570@piout.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 24/03/2016 at 09:54:06 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : > > > > > - use bootstrap as first stage bootloader > > > > > > > > As opposed to? Did you mean at91bootstrap3 rather than "bootstrap"? > > > > > > As opposed to u-boot spl which is less tested than at91bootstrap3. > > > > OK. I think Alex has a somewhat different opinion on the matter, but I > > guess that if the vendor recommends to use at91bootstrap3, we should > > use this solution in our defconfig. > > > > I know he doesn't share the same opinion. At the moment u-boot spl is not > working on SAMA5D2. Moreover, latest enhancements for at91bootstrap are > probably not ported to u-boot spl. > Still, the configs I submitted were using at91bootstrap ;) The one using u-boot spl was initially from Ryan Barnett. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com