From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Project configuration management
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:44:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160404204429.472fb279@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24791852-D548-43A1-8E3D-C39D69F479BB@vestiacom.com>
Hello Mateusz,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:55:44 +0200, Mateusz S?upny wrote:
> We are using buildroot for building a series of projects. What I feel
> is missing in buildroot is a way to store different configurations in
> scope of a single project. For example, we would like to prepare
> three types of builds, let's name them "Release", that is the basic
> build, "Develop", that is a Release build + dropbear + some other
> utilities, and "Extra", that contains all configuration options from
> Develop + some additional tools (gdb, valgrind, etc.). To achieve
> that, we have to maintain total of (number of projects) x (number of
> build types) different configuration files that are almost identical.
>
> Can this goal be achieved without using multiple defconfig files that
> share approx 90% of their contents? What would you advise to avoid
> that?
>
> First solution that comes to my mind is to allow nesting defconfig
> files with some include/source statement, but AFAICS that's not
> supported.
>
> Please note that we are aware of "layered customizations" concept,
> and we're using it to some degree, but it doesn't solve all the
> issues, e.g. setting toolchain, selecting packages, and setting
> multiple paths to layers itself has to be done in defconfig files
> anyway.
The mechanism we typically advise in such situation is to use defconfig
fragments, and assemble them as needed to create the configuration you
feed into Buildroot. A shell script (or other) can help generating the
configuration fed into Buildroot from the fragments.
I'm Cc'ing Gustavo, who has been using this model for quite some time
for a large project that involves multiple HW platforms, I'm sure he
can give more insights on how to achieve that.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 13:55 [Buildroot] Project configuration management Mateusz Słupny
2016-04-04 18:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-04-04 20:45 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-05 11:14 ` Mateusz Słupny
2016-04-06 14:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-06 16:01 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-04-04 19:09 ` Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160404204429.472fb279@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox