Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] dpdk: new package
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 16:38:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160417163814.03b67f53@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460826490-15614-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>

Hello,

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:08:10 +0200, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> This patch introduces support of the DPDK library (www.dpdk.org) into
> Buildroot. DPDK is a library for high-speed packet sending/receiving
> while bypassing the Linux Kernel. It allows to reach a high throughput
> for 10-100 Gbps networks on the x86 platform.
> 
> The package compiles and installs DPDK libraries on the target and
> staging and allows to compile other applications depending on the DPDK
> library. It can also install some basic tools the DPDK provides
> (testpmd, python scripts, test suite).
> 
> The patch assumes DPDK 16.04. This version contains support for the ARM
> architecture. The ARM ports can be tested by
> 
>  qemu_aarch64_virt_defconfig
>  qemu_arm_vexpress_defconfig
> 
> The included hash was calculated locally by downloading the tar.gz archives by
> hand.
> 
> There are unfortunately some pitfalls:
> 
> * it may require to enable PCI, MSIX, UIO in the Linux Kernel
>   (some defconfigs does not include as default and it is platform
>   dependent as ARMv7 almost does not use PCI)
> 
> * when building PCAP PMD driver, the libpcap is required (partially
>   fixed as suggested by Arnout)
> 
> * some tools the DPDK provides depend on Python(2) so the user has
>   to enable it to install those
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>

Thanks for this new iteration. Unfortunately, it still doesn't install
any kernel module to my system. At install time, your addition of the
install-kmod target simply does:

make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'install-kmod'.

Moreover, are you sure having a Linux kernel already built is always
necessary? My understanding is that while DPDK has its own kernel
modules, it can also rely on the kernel generic uio_pci_generic module.
In this case, DPDK only needs to build userspace components, and no
kernel component, which would make the dependency on Linux optional.

From the DPDK documentation: "To run any DPDK application, a suitable
uio module can be loaded into the running kernel. In many cases, the
standard uio_pci_generic module included in the Linux kernel can
provide the uio capability.".

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-17 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-22 10:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 0/3] dpdk: new package Jan Viktorin
2016-03-22 10:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/3] python-ptyprocess: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-22 11:02   ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-03-22 10:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 2/3] python-pexpect: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-22 11:06   ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-03-22 10:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 3/3] dpdk: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-22 20:12   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-23 12:50     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-25 12:32     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-25 13:17       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-27  1:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 0/3] " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-27  1:31   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/3] python-ptyprocess: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-27  1:51     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-15 20:47     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-27  1:31   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/3] python-pexpect: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-27  1:50     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-27 20:51       ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-04-15 20:49     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-27  1:31   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/3] dpdk: " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-27  1:48     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-15 21:52     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-16  0:07       ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-16  7:31         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-16 17:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] " Jan Viktorin
2016-04-17 14:38   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-04-17 15:56     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-17 19:35       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-17 20:56         ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-17 21:06           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-18  8:23             ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-18 22:50               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-19 12:27                 ` Jan Viktorin
2016-04-19 19:30                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-19 20:47                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-19 21:41                     ` Jan Viktorin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160417163814.03b67f53@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox