From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:25:35 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] openzwave: new package In-Reply-To: <4485_1461568414_571DC39E_4485_77_1_EEB3FED4859B6C488DDDEC4B2D3DE92B0FC5BBD4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <18817_1461334846_571A333E_18817_3477_2_e09544cf-8249-4083-9f10-e131ddeb87e0@OPEXCLILM6D.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20160423003957.215d1683@free-electrons.com> <4485_1461568414_571DC39E_4485_77_1_EEB3FED4859B6C488DDDEC4B2D3DE92B0FC5BBD4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <20160425092535.3c606c2a@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:13:34 +0000, fabrice.fontaine at orange.com wrote: > I will fix all the issues and send a new patch by the end of the day. Great, thanks! > Concerning the email address, my contribution has been validated > internally by Orange but I can use my personal email address to send > the new patch if needed because I can't remove the footer added by > the mail server. I am not sure how much strict we (the Buildroot community) want to be regarding such confidentiality footers. After all, it only says "may contain confidential or privileged information", which means that it may also contain public information. I'm not sure what other open-source projects are doing? Apparently at http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-December/050573.html, the Linux MTD maintainer rejected a patch due to a confidentiality footer. Peter, Arnout, Yann, what's your position on this? (http://www.economist.com/node/18529895 is an interesting article on the matter, probably useful to share with the relevant folks in Orange :-)) Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com