From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:24:34 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 4/4] ring-daemon: new package In-Reply-To: <1541125393.275698.1461608322652.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> References: <1461358628-9352-1-git-send-email-patrick.keroulas@savoirfairelinux.com> <1461358628-9352-5-git-send-email-patrick.keroulas@savoirfairelinux.com> <20160423001924.38960007@free-electrons.com> <1541125393.275698.1461608322652.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> Message-ID: <20160425212434.10734123@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, Please don't do top-posting, it's inappropriate on open-source mailing lists. Thanks! On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT), Patrick Keroulas wrote: > Concerning the D-Bus daemon, Ring relies on a session bus but D-Bus > initscript starts a daemon for system bus only. I can change D-Bus > initscript instead of starting it from our Ring initscript. In this > case, in which package should I add the patch? ring-daemon or dbus? I *think* it should be handled in the DBus package itself, though I am not entirely sure. As I understand it, a "session bus" is typically associated to one particular user when this user logs into the system, right? How does that work for ring? Does it use a session bus running as the "ring" user? Aren't session buses normally used for "real" users? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com