From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 22:27:07 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 17/34] reproducibility/libnspr: override build timestamps In-Reply-To: <1462002570-14706-17-git-send-email-gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> References: <20160430074358.GE1781@hermes.click-hack.org> <1462002570-14706-1-git-send-email-gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> <1462002570-14706-17-git-send-email-gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> Message-ID: <20160507222707.2420ef79@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:49:13 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Missing SoB line here. > --- > package/libnspr/0003-honor-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.patch | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/libnspr/0003-honor-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.patch > > diff --git a/package/libnspr/0003-honor-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.patch b/package/libnspr/0003-honor-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..1a0fb7c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/libnspr/0003-honor-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.patch Missing patch description and Signed-off-by line. Also, did you submit this upstream? Does Debian carry a similar patch for its Reproducible Builds effort? Those questions are relevant for every package for which you're adding a patch. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com