From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] toolchain: add bfin support
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 16:02:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160508160217.77aceed3@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160508090242.GA32305@waldemar-brodkorb.de>
Hello,
On Sun, 8 May 2016 11:02:42 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> diff --git a/package/gcc/6.1.0/892-disable-dwarf-bfin.patch.conditional b/package/gcc/6.1.0/892-disable-dwarf-bfin.patch.conditional
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f63ec24
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/gcc/6.1.0/892-disable-dwarf-bfin.patch.conditional
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +Dwarf support does not compile
> +
> +Reported upstream:
> +https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68468
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
> +
> +diff -Nur gcc-6.1.0.orig/libgcc/config.host gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/config.host
> +--- gcc-6.1.0.orig/libgcc/config.host 2016-02-26 21:02:28.000000000 +0100
> ++++ gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/config.host 2016-04-30 20:49:06.542101273 +0200
> +@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
> + esac
> + ;;
> + *-*-linux* | frv-*-*linux* | *-*-kfreebsd*-gnu | *-*-knetbsd*-gnu | *-*-gnu* | *-*-kopensolaris*-gnu)
> +- tmake_file="$tmake_file t-crtstuff-pic t-libgcc-pic t-eh-dw2-dip t-slibgcc t-slibgcc-gld t-slibgcc-elf-ver t-linux"
> ++ tmake_file="$tmake_file t-crtstuff-pic t-libgcc-pic t-slibgcc t-slibgcc-gld t-slibgcc-elf-ver t-linux"
I hate conditional patches. Could we make this patch non-conditional by
doing instead something like:
bfin-*-linux*)
tmake_file="$tmake_file t-crtstuff-pic t-libgcc-pic t-slibgcc t-slibgcc-gld t-slibgcc-elf-ver t-linux"
;;
or something along those lines?
> +# for Blackfin you can't use --with-cpu
> +ifeq ($BR2_bfin),)
> ifneq ($(call qstrip,$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU)),)
> ifneq ($(call qstrip,$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU_REVISION)),)
> HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --with-cpu=$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU)-$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU_REVISION))
> @@ -196,6 +206,7 @@ else
> HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --with-cpu=$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU))
> endif
> endif
> +endif
This will break Blackfin external toolchains, since
BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU_REVISION was added specifically for Blackfin! It is
the only architecture that specifies a value for this variable.
See commit 66d41890ec2b76189bcd427a0cc3966ff56f9712.
If you don't want any --with-cpu option to be passed, then
BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU should be empty. But again, how will this play with
Blackfin external toolchains?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-08 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-08 9:02 [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] toolchain: add bfin support Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-05-08 14:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160508160217.77aceed3@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox