From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 4/4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601170836.3733dbcb@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464791982-10166-5-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br>
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:39:42 -0300, Carlos Santos wrote:
> diff --git a/Config.in.legacy b/Config.in.legacy
> index a0a2059..3f565e8 100644
> --- a/Config.in.legacy
> +++ b/Config.in.legacy
> @@ -145,6 +145,22 @@ endif
> ###############################################################################
> comment "Legacy options removed in 2016.08"
>
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> + bool "FIT support in uboot-tools has been refactored"
> + select BR2_LEGACY
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_DTC
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_DTC_PROGRAMS
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SUPPORT
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_DTC
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SUPPORT
I did not review the entire patch, but those last two lines look
incorrect. The purpose of the
BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option was to
enable support for FIT signature in the *target* variant of
uboot-tools. Hence, I don't see why you are selecting host-dtc and FIT
support in the host variant of uboot-tools.
> diff --git a/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch b/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5404e4f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +From ddcd6cd622889a2d74d0a16efae8e3b2d098f717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
> +Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 11:11:39 -0300
> +Subject: [PATCH] Make FIT support really optional
> +
> +Due to some mistakes in the source code, it was not possible to really
> +turn FIT support off. This commit fixes the problem by means of the
> +following changes:
> +
> +- Enclose "bootm_host_load_image" and "bootm_host_load_images" between
> + checks for CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.c.
> +
> +- Enclose the declaration of "bootm_host_load_images" between checks for
> + CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.h.
> +
> +- Condition the compilation and linking of fit_common.o fit_image.o
> + image-host.o common/image-fit.o to CONFIG_FIT=y, in tools/Makefile.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
It would be good to mention the upstream status of this patch. At least
so that I remember instead of asking you again and again if it has been
sent upstream :-)
I'll do a full review later on. Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 14:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] uboot-tools: add missing dependency on host-dtc for the host package Carlos Santos
2016-05-05 20:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 20:17 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-05-05 21:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-05 20:32 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-05 20:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 21:27 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-05 21:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 21:44 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-06 12:02 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-06 11:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 " Carlos Santos
2016-05-06 13:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-08 19:39 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-08 19:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Carlos Santos
2016-05-08 19:46 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-28 13:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-31 17:33 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-31 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-31 19:40 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-31 19:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 0/4] uboot-tools: fix support for Flat Image Trees (FIT) Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/4] uboot-tools: use $(TARGET_STRIP) for target utilities Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 2/4] uboot-tools: improve the help text of existing options Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 3/4] uboot-tools: re-generate patches to match v2016.05 Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 4/4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 15:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-06-03 19:35 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] " Carlos Santos
2016-06-07 2:25 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-07-05 15:11 ` Romain Naour
2016-07-06 2:43 ` Carlos Santos
2016-07-06 2:55 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] " Carlos Santos
2016-07-06 21:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-07-08 20:33 ` Carlos Santos
2016-07-08 20:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 0/3] util-linux: cleanups, additions and reworked utilities menu Carlos Santos
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 1/3] util-linux: clean up libraries and tools selections Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 13:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 2/3] util-linux: expand selection of libraries and utilities Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 13:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 3/3] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 14:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-07 21:12 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-01 15:07 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 0/4] uboot-tools: fix support for Flat Image Trees (FIT) Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160601170836.3733dbcb@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox