From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:50:06 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 10/14] imx-parser: rename from libfslparser and bump version to 4.0.9 In-Reply-To: <605423330d42aee494d4b1addf05e08df982ad49.1465578220.git.awebster@arcx.com> References: <605423330d42aee494d4b1addf05e08df982ad49.1465578220.git.awebster@arcx.com> Message-ID: <20160615225006.7a12bd7a@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:13:18 -0400, Andrew Webster wrote: > +IMX_PARSER_VERSION = 4.0.9 > +IMX_PARSER_SITE = $(FREESCALE_IMX_SITE) > +IMX_PARSER_SOURCE = imx-parser-$(IMX_PARSER_VERSION).bin > +IMX_PARSER_INSTALL_STAGING = YES > + > +IMX_PARSER_LICENSE = NXP Semiconductor Software License Agreement > +IMX_PARSER_LICENSE_FILES = EULA COPYING > +IMX_PARSER_REDISTRIBUTE = NO > + > +define IMX_PARSER_EXTRACT_CMDS > + $(call FREESCALE_IMX_EXTRACT_HELPER,$(DL_DIR)/$(IMX_PARSER_SOURCE)) > +endef > + > +# The Makefile installs several versions of the libraries, but we only > +# need one of them, depending on the platform. This package seems to have several variants of the libraries, including some that are enabled/disabled with --enable-fsw / --enable-fhw. It would be good to understand what those variants are, and if they are related to ARM EABIhf or not. Indeed, it is a bit strange that some parts of the i.MX6 blobs are EABIhf only (imx-gpu-viv), while some other parts don't see to be EABIhf. Or maybe imx-parser has both EABI and EABIhf variants ? In any case, a clarification would be good. I've nonetheless applied, since it was already something that wasn't clear in the pre-existing libfslparser package. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com