From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:13:17 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: bump default to version 2.23 In-Reply-To: <42d8119e5e64c7a67018770b3f029146@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1466590187-21862-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <87r3bpwa02.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <42d8119e5e64c7a67018770b3f029146@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20160622171317.79fbea7e@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:02:15 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > On 2016-06-22 11:53, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > > Why? In the past we have defaulted to latest-1 and 2.24 isn't released > > yet. > > Why not? Default to n-1 has been our tradition for gcc/binutils/glibc for ages. > We're using latest uclibc-ng if it's suitable/for example. Cause uclibc-ng doesn't evolve much beyond bug fixes at the moment, so there's not really a good reason to not use the latest version. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com