Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] arch/arm: Add Cortex-a53 CPU
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:03:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824000345.264d6d2a@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471913603-21487-2-git-send-email-flatmax@flatmax.org>

Hello,

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:53:21 +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
> Adds the Cortex-a53 CPU to the target architecture variant choice. This sets
> the toolchain to use cortex-a53 as the target. The effect is that various
> cortex-a53 tunings are enabled for the compilation of packages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Flax <flatmax@flatmax.org>

Thanks, but as I said, I don't want to duplicate definitions of 64 bits
ARM cores between Config.in.arm and Config.in.aarch64. So I've pushed
at
http://git.free-electrons.com/users/thomas-petazzoni/buildroot/log/?h=aarch64
a branch that does the necessary rework: it merges Config.in.aarch64
into Config.in.arm, does a few preparation steps, and finally adds your
commit on top of that. Could you have a look and let me know what you
think?

I haven't yet looked in detail at your PATCH 3/3 about the FPU support
for ARMv8. It's still a bit unclear to me what level of FPU support is
mandatory/optional in ARMv8, and whether we can just use
crypto-neon-fp-armv8 all the time, or whether we should allow using
fp-armv8, neon-fp-armv8 and crypto-neon-fp-armv8. Do you have some more
detailed information about which feature is mandatory/optional in the
various ARM64 cores?

Also, it is worth reminding that there are some ARMv8-A cores that are
32-bits only: the Cortex-A32 is one example. So ARMv8-A is not equal to
64 bits support.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23  0:53 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] arch/arm a53 + ARMV8, package/fftw rework Matt Flax
2016-08-23  0:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] arch/arm: Add Cortex-a53 CPU Matt Flax
2016-08-23 22:03   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-08-23 23:44     ` Matt Flax
2016-08-24 21:20       ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-08-25  0:55         ` Matt Flax
2016-08-24 22:14       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-25  0:25         ` Matt Flax
2016-08-23  0:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/fftw : Allow all precisions to be installed at the same time Matt Flax
2016-08-23 21:32   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-23  0:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] arch/arm: Add ARMV8 (aarch32) toolchain config Matt Flax

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160824000345.264d6d2a@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox