From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:43:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix makeinfo related issue In-Reply-To: References: <1473364162-23847-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160909164314.17435856@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:45:00 +0200, Romain Naour wrote: > > -# The .info files in the 2.26 tarball have an incorrect timestamp, so > > -# binutils tries to re-generate them. In order to avoid the dependency > > -# on host-texinfo, we simply update the timestamps. > > -ifeq ($(BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_26_X),y) > > +# The .info files in the >= 2.26 tarball have an incorrect timestamp, > > +# so binutils tries to re-generate them. In order to avoid the > > +# dependency on host-texinfo, we simply update the timestamps. > > +ifeq ($(BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_26_X)$(BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_27_X),y) > > Binutils 2.28 will likely have the same issue, why not inverse the condition ? > ifneq ($(BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_24_X)$(BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_25_X),) Right, but maybe I could dream that someone will report the bug to the binutils maintainers, and that the problem will be fixed in binutils 2.28 ? :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com