From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:09:11 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] Improved patches for Arietta G25 and Aria G25 boards
In-Reply-To: <CA+TH9VnFhhz5mG9POQ4JdamrqEkFia1e=SU=vr1b5_QDD7r8Wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1474356875-27902-1-git-send-email-biagio.hkr@gmail.com>
 <CA+TH9VnFhhz5mG9POQ4JdamrqEkFia1e=SU=vr1b5_QDD7r8Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160920120911.695c6a20@free-electrons.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hello,

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:54:25 +0200, Angelo Compagnucci wrote:

> a) Probably you have not grasped the details of image generation, these
> lines:
> 
> file boot.bin {
>     image = "at91sam9x5_arietta-sdcardboot-linux-zimage-dt-3.7.bin"
> }
> 
> renames the the image file
> at91sam9x5_arietta-sdcardboot-linux-zimage-dt-3.7.bin to boot.bin just at
> the moment of building the sdcard image, so I can't see why we need another
> script.

I agree.

> b) I think you have to send your patches to the Tanzilli's github with a
> pull request, I really prefer to have all the Acmesystems related patches
> into his repo.

I don't understand what you mean here. There are no kernel or
bootloader patches added by Biagio patches.

Or maybe you're suggesting that the Buildroot patches themselves should
be sent to Tanzilli's Github?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com