From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:30:53 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] python-psutil: fix build against musl C library In-Reply-To: <8760pq50es.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20160920074127.22328-1-peter@korsgaard.com> <20160920074127.22328-2-peter@korsgaard.com> <20160920121433.3912ca4a@free-electrons.com> <8760pq50es.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20160920133053.3cb8e9bc@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:30:03 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > This is not really the solution recommended by the musl developers. > > Instead, the musl developers would suggest to *not* include > > at all, and instead duplicate the relevant > > definitions in the userspace program. > > Yes, I know it is a hack (as mentioned in the description). The problem > is that the code DOESN'T include linux/sysinfo.h, but it gets indirectly > included from linux/ethtool.h -> linux/kernel.h -> linux/sysinfo.h. > > Do you have any suggestion how to fix this in a cleaner way? The answer of the musl developers would be: don't include in the first place. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com