From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:04:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] shapelib: new package In-Reply-To: <20160921164753.j56sstaxx7jy4j66@tarshish> References: <1469969150-3029-1-git-send-email-mr.zoltan.gyarmati@gmail.com> <20160921155729.1c4332b7@free-electrons.com> <20160921164753.j56sstaxx7jy4j66@tarshish> Message-ID: <20160921200430.74f46a81@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:47:53 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:57:29PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Thanks, I've applied your patch, after doing the following changes: > > > > [Thomas: > > - adjust the license: it's MIT or LGPLv2, add web/license.html to the > > license files > > - rewrap Config.in help text > > - add entry to the DEVELOPERS file.] > > A DEVELOPERS file update on every new package makes cherry-picking harder. For > that reason, I think, Peter stopped updating the CHANGES file in every patch. Right. What should we do then? Update the DEVELOPERS file in a separate patch? But then we're going to have zillions of patches whose sole purpose of to update the DEVELOPERS file. But of course, that's better for cherry-picking. Opinions? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com