From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Le Bihan Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:17:48 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [Patch v3 1/2] rust-bootstrap: new package In-Reply-To: References: <1468533676-10894-1-git-send-email-eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr> <1468533676-10894-2-git-send-email-eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr> <2a62ef7a-1d5f-546d-0287-78cb505a0ec3@mind.be> <20161018204701.GA18610@itchy> Message-ID: <20161019061748.GA24316@itchy> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 16-10-19 00:09:30, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > On 18-10-16 22:47, Eric Le Bihan wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 16-10-16 13:27:51, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 15-07-16 00:01, Eric Le Bihan wrote: > [snip] > >>> +RUST_BOOTSTRAP_LICENSE = Apache-2.0, MIT > >> > >> Can you specify which parts or under which license? > > > > Rust is dual licensed (Apache-2.0 OR MIT). So, I'll change it to: > > > > RUST_BOOTSTRAP_LICENSE = Dual Apache-2.0/MIT > > No, it should be > > RUST_BOOTSTRAP_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 or MIT > > See the example in the manual under the generic package infra [1]. Right. I should have read the manual instead of sampling packages. The following ones currently use "FOO_LICENSE = Dual first/second": - libsamplerate - nettle - freetype I'll send a patch to make them compliant. Looking at the manual [1], I do not see what should be used for "proprietary" or "commercial". So, for libsamplerate, should I use "LIBSAMPLERATE_LICENSE = GPLv2+ or COMMERCIAL"? [1] https://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses Best regards, -- ELB