From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:39:30 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Autobuilder issue In-Reply-To: References: <20161108094539.6f9b4534@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20161108163930.5f65bb38@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:11:09 -0600, Matthew Weber wrote: > > So the problem your autobuilder instance is reporting should not occur, > > i.e it should not be possible to start the build of a configuration > > that has BR2_NEEDS_HOST_JAVAC=y if javac is not installed. My > > autobuilder instance does *not* have javac installed, and does not > > report those core-dependencies failures. > > > > Did you change anything in your autobuilder instance recently? > I haven't on that instance. > > > Installed/removed some packages? Modified the autobuild-run script? > The auto builder script is modified to generate a smaller package set then > the default so that I can use a less powerful machine. My guess would be a > issue with this logic. It would be better to upstream such changes, so that they can be reviewed. Having people run custom versions of the autobuild-run script can really lead to surprising things. > > Could you have a look at what's going on? > I've stopped that instance until I can look at it tonight. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com