From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:18:08 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] ninja/python-meson packages In-Reply-To: <20161110044245.mpwgroempys43o27@tarshish> References: <98b7a6164112ee321e9220d5b8c47a33@openmailbox.org> <20161109212812.39399895@free-electrons.com> <37cfb466-91a2-2434-24a4-dbd13ddfbc0f@openmailbox.org> <20161110044245.mpwgroempys43o27@tarshish> Message-ID: <20161110091808.06ceb521@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:42:45 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:01:12PM +0100, C?dric Marie wrote: > > Roughly, add dependency on ninja, add an option in cmake configure step (-G > > ninja) and use ninja instead of make in build and install commands. > > Does that mean that we won't be able to use the host distro installed cmake? > Not so good in terms of build time. I guess it offsets most of the build time > gain in moving to ninja, if not more. This is one of the reasons why I want to have this as an option, at least initially. We clearly want to keep the nice benefit of using the system-provided CMake. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com