From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:33:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/3] toolchain: workaround musl/kernel headers conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20161115233347.107fd31d@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:33:31 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > However, if bridge-utils and norm are really the only packages that suffer from > this problem, is it really worthwhile to apply this workaround? I'm sure there are more packages that we have patched for this reason, and possibly other build failures still unfixed that would get fixed (or at least partially). *However*, the musl folks have already committed a patch that apparently resolves the problem: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=04983f2272382af92eb8f8838964ff944fbb8258 Baruch, could you investigate whether this musl commit fixes the header conflict problem for bridge-utils and norm? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com