From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:46:37 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/10] docs/manual: document the waf-package infra In-Reply-To: <20161117204739.GD3574@free.fr> References: <20161117000456.04b7e672@free-electrons.com> <20161117204739.GD3574@free.fr> Message-ID: <20161118094637.502607c8@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:47:39 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Thomas, All, > > On 2016-11-17 00:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:02:14 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > [--SNIP--] > > > +* +LIBFOO_BUNDLED_WAF+ can be set to +YES+ or +NO+ to tell Buildroot to > > > + use the bundled +waf+ executable. If set to +YES+, the default, then > > YES is in fact not the default :-) > > Well, "! NO" is the default. ;-) Nope, I think you're getting it wrong like on IRC. The default is actually empty, which means "YES", i.e "the waf script is bundled and there is no need to add a dependency on host-waf". Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com