From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:06:06 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/ghostscript: new package In-Reply-To: <20160912232623.1fc706be@free-electrons.com> References: <20160906203620.4685-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20160912232623.1fc706be@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20161208230606.64ce147c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:26:23 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Since this mess of pre-defined per-architecture header files is really > nasty, could you instead try to package the latest git version of > ghostscript ? > > Indeed, since early July, the Git repository includes numerous > cross-compilation fixes, and especially > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=user/chrisl/ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a44ce497dbf6064981d88953df63bfdfce0a984 > which generates the arch.h header using regular configure.ac tests. > > This should hopefully greatly simplify the whole problem. > > The libtiff directory problem has also been fixed by > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=user/chrisl/ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d3982f844fed6d6cb092055980900289fb6a402. > > But it's not clear which of these have landed in the main Ghostscript > Git repository at http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=summary, > unfortunately. > > Could you have a look into this? Could you please rework your patch to use the latest Git version of ghostscript? It has commit http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3c4bf022a631be939ebb4bf6f59e41514cb1e48 which simplifies things a lot: - No need to build host-ghostscript - No need for hardcoded architecture headers Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com