From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:35:56 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 0/7] qt5 bump to 5.8.0-rc In-Reply-To: <56c27c5a-07e1-3709-4bfc-60521b0a12c1@andin.de> References: <1481641171-10407-1-git-send-email-anaumann@ultratronik.de> <20161217154629.09d3f0e3@free-electrons.com> <3e4baa3d-e4cf-0a3f-6508-f68f87012812@andin.de> <20161219102642.2b2b57e3@free-electrons.com> <20161221102024.71833cdc@free-electrons.com> <56c27c5a-07e1-3709-4bfc-60521b0a12c1@andin.de> Message-ID: <20170103133556.66be6aa6@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:55:13 +0100, Andreas Naumann wrote: > > If you look at your patch switching to 5.8 there is in fact very, very > > little change in the .mk files, so that can be handled with a bunch of > > ifeq () conditions. > > Ok, so the policy for the future would be to support 5.6/LTS + latest > release? Yes, latest LTS and latest release. > For the hash files, is it possible to just add another line? Yes, it is possible to have as many lines as you want in a hash file, matching different files. > About how to go on: I'm not clear if my v4 set stayed without comments, > for above not being integrated or just Christmas/New Years. People haven't had the time to review it. I will not personally be able to look into it within the next two weeks, but hopefully someone else can have a look. However, I guess we need a version of the series that keeps the LTS version around. > Also, the proposed release date of 5.8 moved to the 17th of January > in the meanwhile. What would be a good next step? Definitely. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com