From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:14:18 +1300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] vala: fix package suffix In-Reply-To: <20170112133831.12223-1-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> References: <20170112133831.12223-1-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20170124231418.3d5f2985@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:38:30 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > vala executable has a suffix and we reffer to it in our vala wrapper, > but we assume that suffix is always the same as the major version. This > can be wrong, so better to obtain the suffix number from the config.h > file. > > Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera Nope, that is not needed I believe. Like all Gnome projects, 0.35 is not a stable vala version, so there's no reason to package it. And I guess that also explains why vala 0.35 still uses 0.34 as the package suffix. So, by not package a development version, we also don't need this "fix package suffix" patch. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com