From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2017-02-15
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216191445.GI12810@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216111120.107a7a61@free-electrons.com>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:21:54 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>
> > commit a44d7f2dbb19a54a8f2beb5c0f0adb0680999319
> > Author: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
> > Date: Sun Dec 4 12:20:27 2016 +0100
> >
> > uclibc: update to 1.0.20
> >
> > The test suite is removed from the package and is already a separate
> > package in buildroot. All patches are upstream, so remove them.
> > The UCLIBC_HAS_LFS option is removed upstream.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
> > [Thomas: remove BR2_UCLIBC_INSTALL_TEST_SUITE option, add it to
> > Config.in.legacy.]
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
>
> Seems like the story is more complicated. I did a build of czmq right
> before the uClibc bump to 1.0.20, and right after, and both builds were
> successful.
>
> Two options:
>
> - This commit is not the culprit.
>
> - My simple configuration with just czmq doesn't trigger the problem,
> and it's only czmq with some optional dependencies that triggers the
> problem.
I have a clear idea what is the problem in uClibc-ng. It is arm
specific. But I have trouble to reproduce the czmq issue with the
internal static arm toolchain. (simple config, not the autobuild
config).
Is there any difference between internal and external static
toolchains, when both created with buildroot?
best regards
Waldemar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170216072900.AAE4920BC6@mail.free-electrons.com>
[not found] ` <CALdGskKtWsQOyKehenpwZHyaMuYHQ600kiMr4w080DNYGRcBKQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-16 9:21 ` [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2017-02-15 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-16 10:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-16 19:14 ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
2017-02-16 21:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-17 7:13 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-02-17 9:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216191445.GI12810@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
--to=wbx@openadk.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox