From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] gstreamer1: drop unused configure time unaligned access handling logic
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:06:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170218110616.GC3632@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a89ju5r1.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Peter, All,
On 2017-02-18 11:56 +0100, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly:
> >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes:
>
> > Peter, All,
> > On 2017-02-18 10:25 +0100, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly:
> >> gstreamer has moved to build time unaligned access support detection using
> >> ifdefs in gstconfig.h since 1.9.2:
> >>
> >> commit 6ef601367e0f5adb7a8b02cec94dec04fccf701a
> >> Author: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@centricular.com>
> >> Date: Tue Jun 21 18:59:49 2016 +0530
> >>
> >> gstconfig.h: Detect unaligned access support at compile-time
> >>
> >> This makes gstconfig.h completely arch-independent. Should cover all
> >> compilers that gstreamer is known to build on, and all architectures
> >> that I could find information on. People are encouraged to file bugs if
> >> their platform/arch is missing.
> >>
> >> So ac_cv_unaligned_access is no longer used and our logic can be removed.
>
> > In the previous patch, you add the or1k conditions to the if-block, but
> > it is unused and you remove it here.
>
> > So I think this patch should come before you fix or1k, i.e. swap patches
> > 2 and 3, no?
>
> No, I think you are mixing up gstreamer and gstreamer1.
No, I don't think so...
> Patch 1 fixes gstreamer by adding or1k to the configure handling
> Patch 2 fixes gstreamer1 by adding a patch fixing gst/gstconfig.h
Here you patch package/gstreamer1/gstreamer1/gstreamer1.mk to also
apply the as_cv_unaligned_access=no in the or1k case, but...
> Patch 3 cleans up gstreamer1 by removing the unused configure handling
... you remove it right here, in patch 3, since that passing
as_cv_unaligned_access=no no longer works anyway.
So I question the fact that patch 2 is wrong (at least partly useless)
in passing as_cv_unaligned_access=no when it is not used.
So, I would argue that we should do:
Patch 1 fixes gstreamer by adding or1k to the configure handling
Patch 3 cleans up gstreamer1 by removing the unused configure handling
Patch 2 fixes gstreamer1 by adding a patch fixing gst/gstconfig.h
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-18 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-18 9:25 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] gstreamer: fix unaligned detection for or1k Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-18 9:25 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] gstreamer1: " Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-18 9:25 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] gstreamer1: drop unused configure time unaligned access handling logic Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-18 9:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-02-18 10:56 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-18 11:06 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2017-02-18 12:35 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-18 14:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] gstreamer: fix unaligned detection for or1k Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170218110616.GC3632@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox