From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:22:12 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 3/3] qt5base: make harfbuzz support selectable In-Reply-To: <20170220221444.4792d09a@gmx.net> References: <20170218113202.14213-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20170218113202.14213-3-ps.report@gmx.net> <20170220220434.728a8a89@free-electrons.com> <20170220221444.4792d09a@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20170220222212.458f5c7d@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:14:44 +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > This patch is a follow up on your (and Arnout's) suggestion to prefer > system libraries, freetype first, harzbuzz second..., so logically it > belongs to the freetype patch... > > But no mandatory need for this patch to be applied to master, maybe > next is enough... > > At the moment always the qt built-in harfbuzz is used... OK. The freetype one was really needed in master as it was fixing a build issue. However, I'll keep the harfbuzz patch around until next gets merged back into master after the release. We've been building Qt with the internal harfbuzz so far, so let's keep it this way for the release. Are you also looking at the other qt5 failures on various architectures? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com