From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Seiderer Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:01:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-02-20 In-Reply-To: <20170221224804.5f901ab5@free-electrons.com> References: <20170221072902.80C59207F9@mail.free-electrons.com> <20170221224230.245a035a@gmx.net> <20170221224804.5f901ab5@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20170221230119.5750f9cd@gmx.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:48:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: Hello Thomas, > Hello, > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:42:30 +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > > > xtensa | qt5base-5.8.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ce6f506f610434dff1d0eb64644be0200d7c52f6 > > > > ../3rdparty/double-conversion/include/double-conversion/utils.h:81:2: error: #error Target architecture was not detected as supported by Double-Conversion. > > #error Target architecture was not detected as supported by Double-Conversion. > > > > Tried to compile with 'QT5BASE_CONFIGURE_OPTS += -no-doubleconversion', but gives: > > > > Qt Core: > > DoubleConversion ....................... no > > Using system DoubleConversion ........ no > > > > [...] > > > > ERROR: Your C library does not provide sscanf_l or snprintf_l. > > You need to use libdouble-conversion for double/string conversion. > > > > Disable BR2_PACKAGE_QT5_VERSION_LATEST for xtensa (or xtensa/uClibc combination)? > > > > > > Similare failure for arc: > > > > > arc | qt5base-5.8.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/fda8a5165cc599adfa4b3cb012916fa4dc38aeca > > Or add support to the double-conversion code? > > For example, m68k support was contributed upstream: > > https://github.com/google/double-conversion/commit/da11179623145f53b204105a93b8bbca431141da Seems simple ;-), but I think it should be done by someone with access to the target arch who can run the double-conversion test suite... > > But indeed, for the release, disabling unsupported architectures is > probably best. Can you send a patch? Can do..., depending on BR2_xtensa or (BR2_xtensa && BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC)? Regards, Peter > > Thanks, > > Thomas