From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:50:33 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 13/25] package/Config.in: explain that lua package names should start with lua In-Reply-To: <20170223170047.24417-14-arnout@mind.be> References: <20170223170047.24417-1-arnout@mind.be> <20170223170047.24417-14-arnout@mind.be> Message-ID: <20170302225033.4c38fbab@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:00:35 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) wrote: > We have decided that lua packages should have a name that starts with > lua (like is the case for python and perl). However, we're not going to > rename all the existing lua packages that don't start with lua. This > makes it unclear for people adding packages how they should name the > package, so add a comment to package/Config.in to explain it. Should we require "lua" as a prefix or "lua-" ? For Perl and Python, we use "perl-" and "python-" respectively. We currently have 10 packages that start with "lua-", and 12 that start with just "lua". Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com