From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:51:37 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/2] package/physfs: new package In-Reply-To: <4328635a-2687-59f6-a192-4af579aafb58@gmail.com> References: <20170301225611.11494-1-romain.naour@gmail.com> <4328635a-2687-59f6-a192-4af579aafb58@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20170305215137.1600833e@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:52:48 +0100, Romain Naour wrote: > PHYSFS_LICENSE = zlib license (physfs), LGPLv2.1+ (lzma) This is not completely correct. Read src/lzma/lzma.txt for details (and include it in the license files). The lzma SDK is available under the following licenses: 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (GNU LGPL) 2) Common Public License (CPL) 3) Simplified license for unmodified code (read SPECIAL EXCEPTION) 4) Proprietary license So perhaps: zlib license (physfs), LGPv2.1+ or CPL or special license (lzma) ? Could you respin after double checking this? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com