From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 23:26:31 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] mkusers: create system users/groups below UID/GID 1000 In-Reply-To: <1486647783-6622-1-git-send-email-p.debruijn@unilogic.nl> References: <1486647783-6622-1-git-send-email-p.debruijn@unilogic.nl> Message-ID: <20170305222631.GL3671@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Pascal, All, On 2017-02-09 14:43 +0100, Pascal de Bruijn spake thusly: > Try not to create users/groups past UID/GID 1000, as this space > is usually reserved for proper user/group accounts. > > Change buildroot behaviour to be similar to distros (like Debian) > where UID/GID 101-999 are used for dynamic allocation to system > service accounts. > > Signed-off-by: Pascal de Bruijn > --- > support/scripts/mkusers | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/support/scripts/mkusers b/support/scripts/mkusers > index d834578..c9f31fc 100755 > --- a/support/scripts/mkusers > +++ b/support/scripts/mkusers > @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ myname="${0##*/}" > > #---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Configurable items > -MIN_UID=1000 > -MAX_UID=1999 > -MIN_GID=1000 > -MAX_GID=1999 > +MIN_UID=101 > +MAX_UID=999 > +MIN_GID=101 > +MAX_GID=999 Although I don't have any hard conviction for a specific range or another, I don't like the rationale. For one, why would we need to stick to similar numbering as standard distros to begin with? as far as I know, nothing mandates any UID:GID range for anything, except that 0:0 is for root:root. Second, this script does not create only so-called "service accounts"; it is perfectly legit to use that script to create "normal" users. If you need to guarantee a numbering for specific users, then you should pass your own user tables with the uids and gids you care about; Buildroot will happily use the UIDs/GIDs used therein, even outside the range here. However... I would love to see that range being configurable in the menuconfig, instead of having to edit the file to change the range. I believe this would be much more user-friendly and would cover your use-case as well. I believe. ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'