From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:03:11 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] libnl: bump to version 3.2.29 In-Reply-To: <061cbb4c-8b53-4f32-9d03-344b1ff0c009@zacarias.com.ar> References: <4ebba581b256855a7e36993f044ef2b6a6cdfd72.1489136084.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <061cbb4c-8b53-4f32-9d03-344b1ff0c009@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20170310120311.2517d6d3@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:56:00 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > Did you try with older headers? > Beacuse last time i tried 3.2.{28,29} weren't happy at least with 3.2.x > hence i refrained from bumping and carrying that dependency along a few > packages. Thanks for this report. To avoid such bumps, it would be nice when you realize a bump shouldn't be done for reason X, Y or Z, to send a patch that adds a comment above the _VERSION variable that indicates why it shouldn't be bumped, or at least what the person doing the bump should take care of :) Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com