From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ifupdown-scripts: new package
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:02:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170319150212.11fa6742@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489916894-2692-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Hello,
Looks good to me overall. A couple of questions/comments below.
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:48:14 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> The ifupdown scripts can be used independently of the init system, be it
> sysv, busybox or systemd; they could even be used when there is no init
> system (i.e. the user is providing his own).
>
> Currently, those ifupdown scripts are bundled in the skeleton.
>
> But we soon will have a skeleton specific to systemd, so we would be
> missing those scripts (when systemd-networks is not enabled).
>
> So, move those scripts to their own package.
>
> This new package is selected by the various init systems that need it.
> This means that, no longer being part of the skeleton but being selected
> by the init systems, they are now available even when a custom skeleton
> is used, like our initscripts are.
>
> Previously, the systemd service was provided by systemd, while the syv
> startup script was provided by initscripts. Both are moved to this new
> ifupdown-scripts package for consistency with the other scripts. We
> still intall the systemd service file because ifupdown-scripts cannot be
> enabled when systemd-networkd is enabled.
>
> Instead of being a target-finalize hook, the scripts are installed as
> any other package are, with a package install-target command.
Do we know why we were doing this in a target-finalize hook? After all,
skeleton is also a package, so it could also have done this stuff in
its install-target command. Is it simply a legacy of the time where
this was done outside of the skeleton package? Or did we have a true
reason to use a target finalize hook?
> +# Package automatically enabled by the selected init-system,
> +# either busybox, sysv-init or systemd (w/o networkd).
> +# We use a little trick to hide the package when not available,
> +# but still show it when needed (except it is forced in this case)
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS
> + bool
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS_DUMMY
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS_DUMMY
> + bool "ifupdown-scripts" if BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS
I don't understand why we want this trick. Just make this package a
hidden package, and that's it. The skeleton package is also hidden, and
it works just fine.
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS
> + bool
> + default y
> + depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_NETWORKD
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS
What about replacing this with:
select BR2_PACKAGE_IFUPDOWN_SCRIPTS if !BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_NETWORKD
on the main BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD option?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-19 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-19 9:48 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ifupdown-scripts: new package Yann E. MORIN
2017-03-19 14:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-03-19 17:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-03-19 22:18 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-06-04 12:55 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170319150212.11fa6742@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox