From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arch: add BR2_READELF_ARCH_NAME hidden config option
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:08:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403170846.397bfbf0@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb0947cc-a940-9edc-a6fd-d324337f6568@mind.be>
Hello,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:24:55 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> So, let me get this clear: libmpeg2 actually does the right thing, and it is in
> fact possible to link the Sparc v8+ library with Sparc libraries?
It's not so much that you can link Sparc v8+ code with Sparc code that
is important: you can link ARMv5 and ARMv7 code together, but running
ARMv7 code on ARMv5 still doesn't make sense.
And "Sparc v8+" on regular Sparc like we support is not going to work.
However, what is important here is that libmpeg is smart enough to not
call into the Sparc v8+ code if we're not on Sparc v8+.
It's exactly like having SSE3 code built-in, and testing at runtime if
SSE3 is enabled before calling the SSE3 specific code. In a Buildroot
context where we normally build for specifically the target system,
this shouldn't be necessary, but some software packages do this anyway.
> In that case, I guess we should extend check-bin-arch to support regexes for
> the expected arch, and set the BR2_sparc arch to "Sparc( v8+)?".
Not as simple: another package may generate Sparc v8+ code, and this
would be bogus.
So, in the context of Buildroot, I believe we should rather patch
libmpeg to not generate the Sparc v8+ code if we are not on Sparc v8+.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-19 13:07 [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arch: add BR2_READELF_ARCH_NAME hidden config option Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-19 13:07 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/2] Makefile: add check of binaries architecture Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-20 21:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arch: add BR2_READELF_ARCH_NAME hidden config option Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-02 10:38 ` Bernd Kuhls
2017-04-02 12:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-03 14:24 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-03 15:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-04-10 15:49 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-12 22:17 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-13 22:15 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403170846.397bfbf0@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox