Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arp-scan: new package
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 20:03:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170408180349.GR5361@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405183445.6cde0af8@free-electrons.com>

Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:14:10 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle
> (Essensium/Mind) wrote:
> > On the br-arm-cortex-m4-full toolchain, the build fails with a
> > segmentation fault in elf2flt, so add an exception for ARM FLAT
> > toolchains. Other FLAT toolchains (e.g. br-m68k-5208-full) work fine.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> > ---
> > I tried to debug the elf2flt segfault but elf2flt isn't exactly the
> > most low-entry-bar source code...
> 
> I think we have a regression here, which I would point to the bump of
> binutils from 2.26 to 2.27. Indeed, several packages are now causing
> segfaults in elf2flt on ARM:
> 
> Busybox:
> 
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/475/4758354f0e2f7f127c1a99ef7846eb62f5ce41b5/build-end.log
> 
> pcre:
> 
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/68c/68cf951594b0e67b45f8711745c17b93e2fbc03e/build-end.log
> 
> and I'm sure the list will grow. So I believe that binutils 2.27
> produces binaries that are a bit different, and confuse elf2flt.
> 
> Looking at https://github.com/uclinux-dev/elf2flt/commits/master, I
> don't see anything that particular stands out.

It seems this is somehow fixed with binutils 2.28. But I have no
idea in which commit(s). Should we blacklist binutils 2.27 for ARM
noMMU?

best regards
 Waldemar

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-08 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05 10:14 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arp-scan: new package Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05 16:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-06  8:26   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-06  8:33     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-06  8:42       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-06  9:55         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-08 18:03   ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
2017-04-10  8:06     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05 21:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170408180349.GR5361@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
    --to=wbx@openadk.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox